Category Archives: LMFRC member post

Footage of flooding at Lake Manitoba

Thank you LMFRC member Kevin Yuill for sharing this footage.

Advertisements

The Flooding of Lake Manitoba, Lake St. Martin & the Dauphin River

By LMFRC member Kevin Yuill

This is the worst environmental disaster Manitoba has ever seen. We saved most homes downstream of Portage la Prairie on the Assiniboine River including Portage, Poplar Point, Elie and Winnipeg at the expense of the many homes all around Lake Manitoba, Lake St Martin and Dauphin River.

This is the largest and longest man made disruption of lives in Manitoba history, the emotional scars won’t heal over night and there were warnings it (the water) was coming.

We need to do what is right for these people which is to put in a proper channel to funnel this water out as close to the speed that it is being diverted in or make a new channel to the Red River and avoid polluting Lake Manitoba any more.

I think about the flooding that’s taking place and I think about my grandson. We want the future generations all around the province to be treated equal and doing what is right today is a good start for our future managers.

I am not saying diverting this water was wrong. I just know that this could and will happen again someday very soon and we must prepare today. Keep politics out of the decision, just get the job done now and done right.

Considering provincial liabilities

By LMFRC member Oli Olson

The Manitoba Government, by running the Portage Diversion on the Assiniboine River, through times of excessive snow melt or rainfall, has been relatively successful at protecting the city of Winnipeg, and farmland en‐route. This diversion of waters from an unnatural source into Lake Manitoba has, at times, caused severe loss of economic opportunities, economic hardship, loss of property, and property damage to many Manitobans living along Lake Manitoba, and Lake St. Martin.

The present government has recognized this, and is considering its liabilities to those that have been sacrificed.

In an attempt to help relieve the flooding, the government has commenced to dredge a relief channel to help remove water from Lake St. Martin. At this time, the government is not committing to a relief channel for Lake Manitoba. Their plan is to let the Fairford River slowly handle the flow over an 8-month period, getting Lake Manitoba down to 813 ( 1 foot higher than the top-of-normal operating range) by next year’s flood season. Then, I assume, they hope for a drought, throughout southern Manitoba and Saskatchewan as the Fairford River Dam can only handle about one third of the Portage Diversion input, should there be the likely need to operate it. In this scenario the flooding and liabilities recycle.

The probabilities of again flooding for 2012 are most likely, as historic evidence shows the lake rises a minimum of 1.5 feet from pre-run off to early summer crest. Therefore the lake will again be put into flood levels.

The Fairford Dam, built in the 60s, is simply outdated. The requirements of today, and the increased drainage in the southwest, are far beyond its capacity. Additional drainage of Lake Manitoba must be constructed, or the continued flooding, and consequent annual liabilities to the taxpayer, will far exceed the cost of channel construction.

The emergency channel to lower Lake St. Martin will do very little to reduce liability, due to damage caused by flooding. Lake St. Martin is less than 8 per cent the size of Lake Manitoba, and a large portion of its shore line in the east and south-east has no development, or very little economic activity. The liabilities are minute compared to Lake Manitoba, which is settled all around, with ranching, and farming, and many large cottage developments, throughout.

The proposed costs to construct an additional channel to enhance drainage from Lake Manitoba range from $195‐330 million. Liabilities and compensation for 2011 alone will greatly exceed this. It is obvious that doing nothing to enhance the exhausting of water from Lake Manitoba, other than running the Fairford River Dam at its full capacity, will be the most expensive option for Manitoba taxpayers.